Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by unshavedyak 899 days ago
Is it not the same for paying for food, as well? I generally agree, but water seems an arbitrary line to draw when we still have shelter and food to consider.
1 comments

Before humans decided to pollute a lot of the fresh water on earth or appropriate it for themselves, humans could just go to the nearest stream and get water. In that sense, it feels right that it should be easily accessible at no cost. Meanwhile, humans have usually had to expand considerable effort to build a shelter and gather or grow food. So i don’t see the line as being arbitrary.
For a good time, go read up about Stewart and Lynda Resnick and their impact to water in California.
This is clearly not true in the desert.