|
|
|
|
|
by jodacola
898 days ago
|
|
It's not just with LEOs where patient privacy gets dodgy. I've helped get a number of tech companies HIPAA compliant, so I've become very familiar with the workings and requirements of the act. My wife, a nurse, works in medical claim management. Lots of healthcare knowledge between us. I've had some very interesting conversations with her because of a tool she's described being used by insurance companies: medical canvassing. It's an "interesting" tool used by investigators that doesn't technically request PHI, but can paint a picture of one's past medical care. Basically, an investigator can ask a health care provider a bunch of yes/no questions - "did the patient receive care between $DATE1 and $DATE2?" "yes" "was the patient treated for $THING_RELEVANT_BUT_UNRELATED_TO_CLAIM?" "yes" "okay, thank you, that's all we needed." No "PHI" requested, none provided, but a picture still painted... and HIPAA allows for it. I'm very curious to know what other interesting methods exist that allow for the circumvention of patient privacy. |
|
How is that not PHI? You asked for treatment information and it was provided. Asking it roundabout way doesn't sidestep HIPAA.