Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kleiba 897 days ago
This is a pet peeve of mine. In the olden days, pre-digital, companies would send you a proper letter back together with your application documents so you could possibly reuse them. That was actually a little work for them to do!

These days, sending an effing canned email to all applicants that didn't get hired costs a company next to nothing, and still ghosting happens.

It's indecent.

4 comments

I recall being taken aback to receive a dead tree rejection letter in the mid 2000s (the only interaction had been me emailing my CV)

The recruiters that meet you in person, talk a big game and then complete silence annoy/confuse me the most - possibly they get commissions for signups?

I once applied to a position in the IAEA. I didn't get the job, but they sent me a letter. I kept that letter for a decade because it was such an unusual occurrence in my carreer.

I got a nice letter from a UN agency, when local companies couldn't be bothered to send an email.

In the olden days, people took time to apply for each job. Nowadays, they spam out applications to hundreds of places in a day.

The problem is on both ends and stems from rewarding quantity over quality.

Can’t expose the precious organization to any form of liability. What if you accidentally leak the internal communication about the candidate *eyeroll*