|
|
|
|
|
|
by Glyptodon
906 days ago
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure plenty of people have seen Batman without paying. Cartoons were just broadcast over the air - advertisers paid I guess. But also if your friend had a video or DVD, or you checked out a comic from the library, or many of dozens of similar situations. Similarly, comic cons are full of people drawing endless numbers of superheros they have no rights to. Hiring an AI is not buying back copyrighted works, it's buying trained experience and having it produce output for you, IE work for hire, like you might get out of a comic book artist. And it's on the hiring party. If there's no sin in a human artist being able to draw batman because they've seen or trained enough, why is it a sin for AI? |
|
|
1. The TV station paid for the cartoons and monetized them through advertising
2. As I said, your friend paid for the DVD, The library paid for the comic, etc. SOMEONE is paying or else the original maker would not be able to sustain making the thing. I can't think of one scenario where you consume media where someone didn't pay for it downstream.
3. A comic book artist creating comics inspired by batman, but not a comic OF batman. Again, as I already pointed out, on a small scale this happens all the time, it's just not word DC sueing a guy on the street doing one painting a day.
If the argument is you should be able to pirate or everything should be free, all good, no judgement, but that's not how it works in the world right now.
It IS a sin for a human to get a batman plushie made and sell it. That's my point. That's what MidJourney is doing when they charge $10 a month to make batman photos.
No manufacturing company in the USA let's you do this, that's why you have to go to China to make Nike knockoffs