|
|
|
|
|
|
by gwd
901 days ago
|
|
|
I don't think I've ever had that problem -- particularly once they introduced Go modules, which specified a specific version of a library dependency. My experience is like the author's: Even old random packages I wrote 5 years ago continue to Just Work when used by new code. There are a handful of functions that they've deprecated, which will produce warnings from `go vet`; but that doesn't stop `go build` from producing a usable binary. |
|
|