Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vouaobrasil 902 days ago
On the other hand, if the main economic mechanisms that help the major players did not exist, we might not have so much spam in the first place.
2 comments

>, if the main economic mechanisms that help the major players did not exist, we might not have so much spam in the first place.

Spam was a massive problem long before big tech existed.

- The old USENET network which was/is a federated ecosystem of servers run by universities etc was overrun with unwanted spam.

- Compuserve dialup network was blocking spam and they were also involved in a 1997 court case (1997 is a year before big tech like Google Inc existed in 1998.): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CompuServe_Inc._v._Cyber_Promo....

- the infamous "spam solutions" webpage that was a snarky attempt at "educating" people about fixing spam was created around February 2004 which was 2 months before Gmail service was introduced: https://craphound.com/spamsolutions.txt

Other "small" areas of the internet are also universally hit with spam abuse:

- blogs that allowed "readers' comments and feedback" got inundated with spam and the blog owners added CAPTCHAS or disabled comments completely.

- small web forums like vBulletin and phpBB forums got hit with spam and admins put in "email signup and valid email verification link" workflows.

- even the newer modern decentralized communication networks like Nostr attract spam: https://old.reddit.com/r/nostr/comments/121ytwf/cutting_thro...

The existence of a big player like Gmail that was introduced in 2004 is not the reason for "so much spam".

Spam volume is always a problem on any communication network where the cost to create new identities is $0 and the cost to send messages is near $0.00. An extreme example of the opposite situation is Bloomberg Terminals chat system not having a spam problem. Why? Because it costs $25000 a year subscription to use. Bloomberg did recently "unbundle" their chat system for a lower price but the point is that the friction for new accounts is still high enough to deter spam abuse.

Tell me you weren't running an email server 20 years ago without telling me you weren't running an email server 20 years ago.