|
|
|
|
|
|
by arpyzo
907 days ago
|
|
|
If ROI is more interesting then why not a comparison with what the ROI of other individuals might have been had they had a starting investment? Also, why should ROI be most interesting? Is money all we care about? Why is it that we have money? |
|
|
You're talking about a "what if" as opposed to concrete numbers we do a simple comparison of.
> Is money all we care about?
No, but in the context of the article, it is the metric.
The point is to challenge the premise that their success was only a product of their starting investment.