|
|
|
|
|
|
by ImPostingOnHN
912 days ago
|
|
|
Why wouldn't it be allowed in a patent? As far as I know, there isn't a law that says patents have to specify the wavelengths used. If you built it with wavelengths that worked, it'd be covered by the patent. If you built it with wavelengths that didn't work, it'd probably be useless. |
|
|
"It is essential that the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) of the claim be established prior to examining a claim for eligibility."
“It is well-settled that mere recitation of concrete, tangible components is insufficient to confer patent eligibility to an otherwise abstract idea”
Flowchart on Pg 19. Section 2016 for the general examination process: https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep-2100.pdf