|
|
|
|
|
|
by lifeisstillgood
902 days ago
|
|
|
I'm going to go with hard agree. Firstly finding the point of leverage (was distribution, now is?) Secondly looking at Game theory, the Tit for Tat approach is simple and consistently useful and well understood - so some ability to "hit back" is very useful. This of course depends on common legal frameworks which is part of the problem but ... |
|
|