|
|
|
|
|
by hello_moto
914 days ago
|
|
Hi-tech are cyclical. Ruby got nothing else bigger than Rails unfortunately no matter how people in that community is hyping Ruby out. It's okay if Ruby and Rails on a downward trend it might pick up again in the future. C'mon now, we all know that our industry is like a Fashion industry. The only reason why Rails is making a comeback is because we're in tough time: no more VC money to hire tons of Engineers to build a web-app. When money was flowing, folks tend to build over-engineered solution (microservice, mesos, container, k8s, cloud-y orchestration), when money is tight, folks tend to build simple stuff because of lack of resources. |
|
But now there is another complication to an eventual reemergence of ruby on rails: the competition defeated the initial comparative advantage - i.e. the simplicity - of the RoR platform. The premises that justified RoR in the past are too weak today in my opinion. The framework was sold on how easy and no-nosense it was setting it up and start prototyping your commercial solution in a time where the competitors were awkward and epitomized by J2EE, where setting up and developing the most basic application was time consuming and complicated.
Today with Spring Boot, for instance, you can bootstrap and develop your app as quickly and easily as any other cool and alternative framework but with the advantage of using a really popular and fast language.
Technologies don't die quickly and COBOL and Perl are the living proof, but it's really hard to see a bright future for RoR and ruby and I think that most of their contribution was already given.