|
|
|
|
|
|
by helpfulmountain
902 days ago
|
|
|
I agree. It may be primarily about integrating the new construction process and a proof of concept for more ambitious projects, but my overall impression is definitely that this is a poor showcase for the technology: it feels sort of embarrassingly academic. |
|
|
Researchers create many “toy” demos. There is often a progression of stages to a full “proof of concept”.
Where is the downside to an intermediate research artifact that demos their current tech level — Which also happens to be a whimsical functional sculpture, adding interest to a grassy area?
And very successfully creating awareness of their efforts?
Nothing remotely “embarrassing” (or “academic”, in the negative use of that word) here.