Came here to say this. 100% is too good to be true and it's almost certainly the AI has figured out a signal leak from the camera, image format, room, etc.
Yes! I would also be surprised if the ground truth didn't have some errors in it.
If a model was 100% accurate, considering the nature/accuracy of manually diagnosing autism you would probably expect the AI to either find new cases or identify a few incorrect diagnosises.
If a model was 100% accurate, considering the nature/accuracy of manually diagnosing autism you would probably expect the AI to either find new cases or identify a few incorrect diagnosises.