These searches are a footnote in the charging documents. This bozo was identified by eyewitnesses and appears in videos posted on Instagram of the riot, had air tickets from his home city to DC, had hotel reservations in DC, was carrying two phones each with logged-in location tracking accounts etc.
It can be supporting evidence for all sorts of things which are argued in court where this person's counsel also gets to challenge it. It's not like Jan 6th defendants were convicted because of their Anchorman fandom.
Not sure why the meme was included but the rest looks like gathering information in preparation for a crime to me.
We are both not lawyers so we don’t know jack tbh
Or is it okay to inexplicably twist that into a crime somehow because it's used to persecute the "right" people in this instance?