Personally I never use either. If I want to know how to do something, my first instinct is to Google it or use ChatGPT. The information is a lot more easily compressed and searchable in a web browser than in CLI tools
If you know how to use info, it’s faster to find what you’re looking for than to use Google or ChatGPT. The interface is incredibly snappy and lets you do a full text search across the entire manual you are reading, quickly and without leaving the keyboard.
Not that there’s anything wrong with using Google or ChatGPT to find what you are looking for, but info is a fast way to get authoritative information, and the documentation is also mirrored on the web so it can be easily indexed by search engines and LLMs.
Assuming you always have convenient access to the internet. And that you version of the tool you are working with matches whatever result you find online.
And even then, often the best results you get from google come from the man or info page anyway.
My first search when googling documentation for a tool is often "man <toolname<"
I like to minimize the amount of time I spent with instant access to the web because too much instant access to the web is bad for my mental health. That's why I arranged things so that I don't need web access when I'm programming, and Info is a major part of my having been able to do that.
I just chose my most addictive sites and pointed them to 127.0.0.1 in my hosts file. When I open the browser and my Brian instinctively opens them, I get nothing.
For home projects, I have microsoft's docs on C++ and C# downloaded locally, but for work I need to be connected to the internet to do my job
I do that, too, in addition to keeping my cable modem off while I am programming (with the result that I have to wait about 8 minutes from any decision to use or access the web to when the web actually starts to be accessible to me).
Thanks for telling me that microsoft's docs on C++ and C# can be cached locally. I tried to create local copies of some docs on web programming, but found out that it cannot be done
with a reasonable amount of effort by people who are not already experts in web programming.
Yeah I'd say that chatgpt is wrong maybe 10 or 20% of the time. It generates old or straight up wrong information. You have to double check it against stackoverflow
Not that there’s anything wrong with using Google or ChatGPT to find what you are looking for, but info is a fast way to get authoritative information, and the documentation is also mirrored on the web so it can be easily indexed by search engines and LLMs.