|
|
|
|
|
by timmb
915 days ago
|
|
> Between direct public spending and compulsory, tax-driven insurance programs, Germany spent about $380 billion in health care in 2022; France spent around $300 billion, and so did the U.K.; Italy, $147 billion; Spain, $105 billion; and Austria, $43 billion. The total, $1.2 trillion, is about two-thirds of what the U.S. government spent without offering all of its citizens the option of forgoing private insurance. Is it fair to include Germany here? I thought the German system required everyone to have private insurance through their (breadwinner’s) employer. But I’ve only heard this via self-employed people complaining of having to pay €300 a month in health insurance. To me it sounds more like the American system than the UK one of everything just being free and state-funded. But as I say, I only know through hearsay. |
|
If you are self employed, you can choose to stay in the regulated system. However, since you are now both employer and employee, you have to cover both sides of the fee. For many self employed people, switching to a private healthcare provider saves them money, because there the fee, depending on some factors, is usually lower - it does no longer depend on the gross salary, but on the insuranced person's personal circumstances. However, private healthcare provides are to some degree also state regulated; there is a minimum set of service they are required to provide.
The cases of regular employees that don't go with state regulated healthcare providers are low. The cases of self-employed people that don't go with private healthcare are low. If you make enough money, you can start calculating wether switching to the private sector is benefitial to you. But it is impossible not to have health insurance, and it is impossible to go bankrupt because of health related costs in Germany.