|
|
|
|
|
by markisus
913 days ago
|
|
Solutions to linear differential equations are exponentials, and this may be what the author meant. In a state space model, we can write Newton's law under gravity if we let y(t) = [x(t), x'(t)]^T, let A = [ 0, 1; 0 0], let b = [0, -g]^T, and set y'(t) = A y(t) + b. Indeed, the solution is y(t) = exp(A t) (y0 + int_0^t exp(-As) b ds). In Einstein's theory, we have a generalization which says a stone's path through space-time follows a geodesic of the metric. In differential geometry, the exponential function, by definition, sends tangent vectors to geodesic curves. So the author is right, under this interpretation. |
|
Huh?
You can say “state space,” invoke the general solution to inhomogeneous ODEs, and write it out with integrals and matrix exponentials, and the answer is still quadratic. Unless you consider t^n e^(0t) to be exponential. (Hint: what are the eigenvalues of A? One could start by calculating A^2.)
Which leads to one of the most important lessons from all of physics: you can take a problem, use a different technique to solve it, and you get the same answer! It’s magic.