Ignoring the disclosure etiquette here, then making an irrelevant rebuttal about relevance when the point was disclosure, then getting snarky with the person who tried to helpfully point it out?
I have no opinion on your products or your post, but some % of people steer away from companies for such things.
My views are my own and as such I do not disclose my employment or otherwise on here.
I did think twice about posting it, as I don't usually but it's relevant and i might be helpful so why not? If you don't like it, thanks for the downvote.
Wow. I learned some stuff about etiquette on HN today.
I'll support you, mnd999. I don't work for a graph dB company. We don't use graph dBs, but I'm considering it. Graph dbs are a legitimate source to feed data I to your RAG system. Our RAG system currently used hybrid search: lexical and semantic. We need to expand our sources, too. I would like to see us use LLMs to rephrase our content (we have a lot of code), and index on that. I think we should build a KG on content quality (we have millions of docs) and software out the things no one likes.
I also think a KG on "learning journeys" would be valuable, but really difficult.
I have no opinion on your products or your post, but some % of people steer away from companies for such things.