[dragonwriter]

When your accusations of hypocrisy are just picking two random writers who have no connection, attributing them tk two different broad diverse groups that each containing many and different viewpoints and are largely unconnected, and then arguing as if these two broad diverse groups are like a single hive mind that should have one consistent viewpoint... maybe instead of doing a hypocrisy based ad hominem against an entity you’ve invented for the purpose you should just either discuss the actual issue?

[ta_vf7xjd34cc]

> two random writers

You know just as well as I do that these positions are not those of two random writers, but that of the ideological Left in each country.[1][2][3] I have seen these discussed at length on tv, youtube and in print in both countries.

[1] https://www.npr.org/2021/06/10/1002594108/a-growing-number-o...

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/12/us/politics/electoral-col...

[3] https://scroll.in/article/1049779/modis-new-parliament-could...

[squigz]

I like this comment, except the last 3 words. Not that I necessarily disagree, but it's not conducive to productive conversation (not to mention goes against HN's guidelines)

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[dragonwriter]

You are right, and I have edited the original comment to remove the offending words, which were unnecessary and unhelpful.