|
|
|
|
|
by dmurray
913 days ago
|
|
> if everyone does this, it will erode the signal of what stars are supposed to mean. What signal? To me, starring a Github project means "I'm interested enough in this project to want to be able to find it again". That's a significantly lower bar than the poster had here, of "I've a new feature proposed for this project, and I'm even interested in implementing it myself if the maintainer agrees". There's a loose correlation of stars with quality/popularity/ activity. All of those correlations should become stronger by having active users and bug reporters star the project. |
|
Well if you're policy is to keep track of issues based on who stars the project, having a lot of stars means poor quality then.
I kind of understand their twisted logic but at the end of the day it just doesn't feel right.
There are plenty of projects who do not need this kind of policy to have a lot of stars.