|
|
|
|
|
by tqkxzugoaupvwqr
921 days ago
|
|
In the beginning of the article it sounds like he saw the object they caught in the net (“What Olver’s net eventually brought to the surface”, “As soon as I saw it I knew what it was.”). In the end of the article where they cite an email he wrote in 2017, it sounds like he never saw the object but his gut instinct told him it was a wing, not a shipping container (“I am convinced this was an aircraft wing”). The wording of his email doesn’t help his case. Leave out all the irrelevant fluff and just say you caught a commercial plane’s wing or large part of it in your fishing net in 2014 and state the coordinates where you dropped the net. Regarding the authorities’ response: It’s strange they did not start an investigation when he claimed he found plane debris. |
|