Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ShadowBanThis01 916 days ago
That doesn't make sense. First of all, "this type of locking system" is clearly a failure because it allowed an unauthorized random person to report a computer as "lost" when he didn't own it. So the answer to your first question is: You wouldn't.

Second, what does this even mean: "without giving users access to their own private keys, then having a much worse problem where dozens of users lose their private keys and forever brick their device?" What scenario exactly does that refer to?

1 comments

> because it allowed an unauthorized random person to report a computer as "lost"

Because (if I under the article correctly?) the owner hadn’t actually enabled “find my mac”?

The (admittedly vague article) said it was "wiped," though. By whom?
By the thief/shop who linked it to their account? IIRC you can still wipe macs without having the password as long as all the theft protection stuff isn’t enabled.