[Hayvok]

The review thread (start at the bottom & work your way up) reads like a Show HN thread that went negative.

The paper initially received some questions/negative feedback, so the authors updated and tweaked the reviewers a bit —

> "We welcome discussion... The main contribution (that seems to have been missed by some of the reviews) is that we can use very shallow models to compute good vector representation of words."

The response to the authors' update:

> Review: The revision and rebuttal failed to address the issues raised by the reviewers. I do not think the paper should be accepted in its current form. > Quality rating: Strong reject > Confidence: Reviewer is knowledgeable