[DaiPlusPlus]

> It certainly isn't good for Adobe

It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products better.

...I hope!

[delecti]

That would certainly be good for Adobe's users, but it means they'll have to put in a lot of work, which costs money that could otherwise buy so many yachts.

[tonyedgecombe]

>It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products bette

Which they thought was harder than spending $20 billion acquiring a competitor.

[xbar]

Maybe it would be more accurate to say that they that there is no way for them to make a product that will steal Figma's market for less than $20 billion.

Adobe's despised reputation in business practices makes it hard for users to choose Adobe when any other creative option when it is available.