Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by eldridgea 915 days ago
I asked a cloudflare engineer this and the answer was a bit vague but amounted to the failure rate being something like 0.5% which was too high for the amount of TLS sessions being initiated all the time.

Although I always thought it would be a nice feature for security conscious folks to be able to ennable. Or go ahead and use it on more sensitive sites only, e.g. banks.

2 comments

Which leads us back to needing caching, which needs a signatory, and a list of trusted signatory, which gets us back to certificate authorities. Gotcha :-).
Caching is something DNS already has in-hand.
Perhaps you're unaware, but that problem can be largely mitigated by DNSSEC, which is why it's considered a requirement to make DANE practical.
What were the circumstances of the failures?