|
|
|
|
|
by GuB-42
912 days ago
|
|
The problem I see here is that one of the functions returns a pointer and it doesn't use the usual pointer syntax. I see no *, no & and no -> in the code. So I would assume everything to behave as if it was owned or even copied. Had it returned actual pointers, or pointer-like objects like iterators, it would have been more obvious. |
|