[tptacek]

Infra engineering is the most important, hardest engineering practice in the company. I'm not one, and the people who want to do this are. So leave a lot of space here for me just being wrong.

I've had a bit of experience implementing IGP-style routing --- both as a "user" (a Cisco network engineer doing multi-area OSPF) and a developer (of a custom link-state IGP) --- and it left me pretty terrified of the failure modes here, which feel pretty similar to those of Raft/Paxos consensus, or of the SWIM Gossip consensus we do in our Consul replacement, Corrosion, which has its own challenges. If there are "innovation tokens", there are also "distributed consensus" tokens, and my basic take is I don't think we should spend them for such a marginal feature.

Here I am litigating an internal company discussion on HN (this is simultaneously bad, and an exercise in us just being an open book). I remind you of the initial paragraph here, which lays out plainly that the people in our company who disagree with me are smarter than me. A really good use case could end my reign of static routing reign of terror!