|
|
|
|
|
|
by mrpippy
921 days ago
|
|
|
I guess the difference here is that there's 3 separate parties: McDonalds corporate, Taylor (makes the ice cream machines), and the franchisee. McDonalds requires the franchisee to buy a specific machine from Taylor (or a dramatically more $$ one from an Italian company IIRC), and places other requirements on the franchisee, but is it legal to interfere in the relationship between the franchisee and Taylor? |
|
|
I think the term is "tortious interference" but it is notoriously very difficult to have upheld in court. You can obviously compete but you can't deliberately undermine a contract with a competitor. IANAL, but from my reading of the article, that would rely on how substantive the safety claims that McD made are in disincentivizing the use of the 3rd party equipment. (not to mention they party wasn't explicitly named in those safety communications)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference