Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by omgwtfbyobbq 914 days ago
It depends on what you're using the images for.

If there's a human in the loop, 100 images/s is likey too much volume, especially if prompt engineering is needed.

At the same time, 2 images/hr is way too slow.

2 comments

The whole point was that you’d be getting ramdom puctures just-in-time, at a leisurely rate suitable for background image rotation, without other interaction.
I mean, if you need a human in the loop to verify the image quality then you HAVE to pre-compute the images.

> 100 images/s is likey too much volume

You can always generate less