|
|
|
|
|
|
by jrockway
924 days ago
|
|
|
Yeah, exactly. That's why I think a categorical ban is not necessarily "good parenting". I think you have to peek in and see what they're watching on TikTok, and provide relevant information. If they think a video where someone burns down a store as "a prank" is funny, remind them of the consequences; hurting other people, prison, whatever. (OK, TikTok is a little less extreme than that, but you get the point.) Certainly, I understand why people want to delegate work to the government here; parenting is hard work. But it's necessary work, you don't want the government's children to go out into the world and do their own thing. You want your kids to. And so your touch is going to be required in their formative years. There is no getting around that. |
|
|
I agree -- both because it's unlikely to be effectual, and because it's not really addressing the root problem of parent involvement.
> I think you have to peek in and see what they're watching on TikTok, and provide relevant information.
Exactly. You can't just expect to go into your firewall settings, ban some URLs and expect that to solve the problem. Or at the same time, to just completely ban them from accessing social media at all (though arguments could be made for monitored/timed access at certain age 'gates') -- I've written multiple other comments about why that can backfire too.