[Ikatza]

Extensions are nice to have, but pointless as long as FF for Android doesn't render most pages correctly (HN, for example).

[scottbez1]

Care to expand a bit?

I've been daily driving FF Android for a few years now and I've had the opposite experience: the vast majority of pages work and render fine (including HN) and it's an extremely rare occasion that I switch to Chrome to use a website. Even then, I often find that Chrome isn't any better and the underlying issue was the website's mobile handling in general (e.g. touch events working differently than mouse events, or just a completely broken mobile-only component swaps)

[emestifs]

Firefox paradox strikes again. User brings up an unrelated thing, even if valid, to lessen something positive.

You seen this pattern again and again in Firefox news threads.

[account42]

> something positive

You mean "we reluctantly unbroke what we previously deliberatly broke".

[berkes]

Ironically, the few times that I see Firefox (for Android) render something wrong, it's because of an addon that is messing with the wrong stuff.

[Aardwolf]

I've never seen HN rendered incorrectly in any desktop or android FF version, what do you mean?

[novemp]

I'm using HN on Firefox for Android right now and it looks totally normal. What are you talking about?

[oblio]

I've been using Firefox and only Firefox on Android for HN for... at least 5 years.

What are you going on about?

HN is a basic site, Lynx on MS DOS could render it.