Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fest 913 days ago
Can you weigh in on the decision to require UniFi controller instead of providing on device configuration interface as well?
1 comments

That was part of the UniFi product since day 1, no?
Yes, but I always found it strange (though I lack any exposure to "enterprise" networking equipment).
It makes good sense for large distributed deployments.

One page to update everything rather than have to connect to each device and push a config. The controller also "back-ports" the configuration as appropriate for a given device. Declare a vLan once, don't have to worry about which cli version is running on a given switch and adjust your command accordingly.

These things don't matter much when you only have one physical location / few devices but if you're an IT guy that manages networking across every physical building in a school district...

Since the device tries to phone home, it's also a NAT buster which is invaluable when you're drop-shipping equipment to customers and have little control over your environment but need to be able to promise some level of functionality.