[hmcamp]

The irony that this page is covered in ads and clickbait content is hilarious

[ghaff]

Essentially the main problem is that a lot of people want to try (even if they mostly fail) to monetize everything--and I assume a lot of people here aren't innocent of that.

[randomdata]

Sounds like the real problem is that the consumer is not very good at communicating their wants, leaving people to guess at what they might be interested in.

[ryanlitalien]

> As the web declines, we pause to talk about the death of criticism and what happens when someone rips off your work.

So if I paste the transcript here on HN, would that prove their point? As currently, I'm not in a position to listen to an hour-long podcast?

[hightrix]

Let's be fair, I'm never in a position to listen to an hour long podcast about a news topic that could likely be covered in a handful of paragraphs.

[ghaff]

And I'm almost certainly not going to read an unedited transcript of an hour-long interview. Interviews are good but they take a fair bit of editing to be really readable in print.

[kensey]

With my browser full-screened and set at 133% zoom for the sake of my eyes, literally 100% of the screen real estate is either ad content (the largest section of which appears to be trying to load a broken image or video, so it's just a huge black rectangle with a tiny missing-image icon in the center) or the navbar, header banner and section header. I can't see any of the actual article without scrolling down.