|
|
|
|
|
by slt2021
925 days ago
|
|
>>Now there's thousands of potential issues. Many are false positives. Inspecting output/logs of Qualys is no different than inspecting logs of kubernetes (or other SRE platform). and both overlap. If you have highly skilled SREs - task them with security. If you dont have good SREs, you have to keep IT architects (and call them infosec) who will be able to look at all your IT Zoo across all your on-prem datacenters and cloud accounts and can make a call to do X,Y, and Z to keep company secure. and who can recover your infra from groun zero in case you got ransomwared |
|
I would worry the argument about "highly skilled SREs" could become a "true Scotsman" argument. If a business has any persons who are skilled enough and plentiful enough to process all of the security output and take action on them, let it be so.
My experience is that in practice, there are not the resources to process all of the output that the tools generate. Do you have experience to the contrary where this has been done at a company scale or is your argument a theoretical one that you believe stands to reason?