[Deprecate9151]

For this grant the 100/20 needed to be consistently available in specific geographic areas. So if the cells bring down the performance averages are concentrated in those grant areas, it makes sense for them to fail to meet the program criteria while still having a product that hits those metrics elsewhere.

[inemesitaffia]

The denial doesn't quote speeds in those areas

[Deprecate9151]

It doesn't, I'm just expanding on why a specific cell meeting the program specifications "usually" wouldn't really move the need for the FCC analysis.

[inemesitaffia]

The denial mentions national speed levels from a third party not the particular coverage areas or services delivered under RDOF