Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by leereeves 914 days ago
Are they getting "squeezed" by Steam? That would imply there is pressure coming from Valve, but the pressure to use Steam is coming from customers.

I'd say that Steam is a great service that customers love and demand that game developers provide, and the 30% fee is the price of that service.

I know that in my own case I've bought games on Steam that were available cheaper elsewhere, or even given away for free on EGS.

And the attempts at creating alternatives have all been unable to create a good alternative. (Except perhaps Good Old Games, which stands out by being DRM-free.)
1 comments
rezonant 914 days ago
Well they're getting squeezed by the 30%, but also that the act of participating in the Steam market means they cannot sell their game for less money (to incentivize a better cut for themselves) off platform, since Steam doesn't allow you to do that, at least to the best of my current understanding. I've posted this elsewhere and had one user pretty upset that I had posted false statements, but I haven't seen evidence to the contrary yet (context is at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38624916)
link
leereeves 914 days ago
Do you have any evidence of that?

I know I've seen games given away for free on EGS while they were also for sale on Steam, and seen lower prices on IsThereAnyDeal, but those might all be temporary.

According to Ars, "Sources close to Valve suggested to Ars that this "parity" rule only applies to the "free" Steam keys publishers can sell on other storefronts and not to Steam-free versions of those games sold on competing platforms."

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2021/05/why-lower-platform-fe...

link
rezonant 914 days ago
Thank you for a source. I do link to my source in the thread in question, and while that law firm was working with Wolfire Games who presumably saw agreements directly from Valve, it's not exactly going to be an unbiased account since they were, you know, suing Valve.

After reviewing the article, it's still a second hand unidentified source, but definitely clear the facts are contested.

I updated that thread with these details.

link