|
|
|
|
|
|
by loloquwowndueo
921 days ago
|
|
|
It doesn’t look like Stéphane has a direct problem with Canonical or anyone else using his code - it’s why he licensed it under Apache in the first place. He’s mostly calling attention to the attempt to relicense as AGPLv3 some code that Canonical has no authority to relicense. The fact that contributions to LXD are now under AGPLv3 and require signing canonical’s much maligned CLA are concerns but I think the author nuances them well : it’s unfortunate (in his pov - me, I always prefer a Copy left license) but well within Canonical’s rights. (Edit: Stéphane beat me by a minute and explains his own position better than I could ;) |
|
|