|
|
|
|
|
|
by worthless-trash
916 days ago
|
|
|
Desktop 2013 i5 - Core i5-3340 (choosing this to put your arguement at an advantage
Mobile 2013 i5 - Core i5-13600T (choosing this as its mobile, with the same approximate price point). https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/5175vs2071/Intel-i5-136... While not the most informative of benchmarks, you'll find that 10 year old i5's really are quite a bit slower, especially when attempting to power more modern hardware (SSD, more powerful GPU) due to the both the slower ram, thinner busses and crappier cache. Intels branding is -so good- that people have blurred all their i5 experiences together. > The point is more about how slow Intel processors still are really. The i3/i5 is not their flagship CPU, Its middle market tech, The 'middle market' gets something which is 'just enough to keep them happy'. Most of these systems run a browser and office, so as long as that works, people are happy. When you want performance from intel you buy their higher end i9's and Xeons, |
|
|