|
|
|
|
|
by wayfinder
913 days ago
|
|
It gave me an intuitive understanding of state machines and idempotency is one solution to transitions. If you start with State A and a call changes it to State B, what does running the call again do? A->B? But you’re already at B. Shit’s going to break. Redesign your system. |
|
If there's a process with two steps, moving from Step A to B requires the process to be at Step A and it's already at step B, it should return an error. At first glance, this doesn't seem the kind of problem that idempotency is supposed to prevent...