Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by roenxi 923 days ago
Those numbers aren't that large. They aren't small in anyone's estimation, but the Empire State Building is a lot less than the amount of material a motivated earthmoving company can get through in a year.

There'd be some interesting technical challenges tearing down Everest, but it is conceivable. The part that requires creative thinking is why it would be worth it spending that much money.

2 comments

Except that volume gets released with an eruption, not over a year...Imagine 5 mount everests lifting up into the air and coming down at the same time.
To build the Panama Canal, excavators removed enough spoil to fill a city block 19 miles high.
You all are talking quantitatively about volumes, but there’s also the qualitative difference between soil and magma.
1800 Panama Canals still sound like quite a lot of work.