|
|
|
|
|
|
by WendyTheWillow
920 days ago
|
|
|
No. Someone violating the social contract doesn't give you permission to violate it yourself. And I didn't say it was always immoral, I said it was generally immoral. One should assume "generally" rather than "always"... in general. |
|
|
At what point does a party become free from the obligations of their social contract with the corporate media company then?
>And I didn't say it was always immoral, I said it was generally immoral. One should assume "generally" rather than "always"... in general.
My apologies, based off your previous comments I assumed you were taking a firm ethical stance here. With that said then, I just want to point out that the claim "vigilante justice is immoral" is far from being ethical consensus among philosophers. (Communitarians vs Forfeiturist)
Ultimately this is outside the scope of our conversation so I'd rather not get hung up on it... the tone of your claim just struck me as oddly bold.