[vitiral]

I was referring to no license. I was referring to this statement

> There is zero practical difference between "free and source available" and "open source" for 99.99% of users.

"Free and source available" is not a license. Without a license it is copyrighted.

[pydry]

"Open source" is not a license either.

"Free and source available" describes a group of licenses including sentry's.

[vitiral]

Okay, but "open source" implies you can change and fork the code. "Free and source available" does not, even if you can in some cases.

That's literally all I said.

[pydry]

It sounds like you are agreeing with me that if you can do that then it's not misleading to call those licenses open source.