[crazygringo]

I think they're about different contexts.

The first paragraph is about training inexperienced computer programmers to do things their way. It's a point frequently made that more experienced programmers don't just need to be trained in the new company's ways, but often need to be untrained from their previous ways -- yet they still cost more. So this isn't about "industry-wide" training, it's more about how company-specific training.

While the second paragraph is more about training relating to transferrable skills. Companies don't want to teach people to become data scientists or ML experts -- they'd rather hire people with those skills already.

Perhaps it helps to think of the first bucket as "generic" programmers, the ones writing CRUD apps or websites or similar. While the second bucket is about "domain-specific" engineers.