|
|
|
|
|
by masklinn
920 days ago
|
|
As it turns out (and as much as we wouldn’t want them to) human lives are still subject to cost/benefit analysis. An airliner is a lot of lives, a lot of money, a lot of fuel, and a lot of energy. Which is why a lot has been invested in training, procedure, and safety systems. Cars operates in an environment which is in most ways a lot more forgiving, they’re controlled by (on average) low-training low-skill non-redundant crews, they’re much more at risk of “enemy action”, the material stresses are in a different realm, and they’re much, much more sensitive to price pressure. Hell, the difference is already visible in aviation alone, crop dusters and other small planes are a lot less regulated amongst every axis than airliners are. |
|
A whole lot more people die from car accidents, yet there are few reports on national news on accidents. So fewer people care. Meanwhile each time there is an aviation disaster, 100s of people die and it's all over the news for weeks. Similarly with train accidents and nuclear accidents. There where only 2 very large ones but they still haunt the field to this day, while (for example) the deaths from solar installations by people falling from roofs are mostly ignored.
Large accidents have to be avoided, a lot of small ones are more acceptable.