[r2b2]

The syntax of your language is quite nice. I’d maybe change (for …) to (each …), (fun …) to (fn …), and (let …) to (def …) or (set …) depending on implementation details of variable assignment, but those are just aesthetic preferences :)

I love '{thing}' for string interpolation.

If you haven’t already, check out clojure, janet-lang, io-lang, and a library like lodash/fp for more syntax and naming inspiration.

Keep building!

[xnacly]

Thanks, I think this language will probably keep my hacking for a while :). you're right about the keyword naming, i tried to be unique, maybe too much for functions, simply because i love them being named "fun". Let in the current implementation definitely is confusing due to it being used for defining and updating a variable and its contents - maybe ill change it to let and set or def and set, who knows. Thanks for the feedback :)