Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pxeboot 923 days ago
This seems like a great start, but unfortunately it will likely be so lucrative, it will make it even less politically acceptable to further reduce/ban cars in the future.
1 comments

When the income pays for more transit and reduces transit times for buses, why would the public want to stop that trend?
Because cars/parking still take up far to much space in dense city centers, making them more loud, dirty and dangerous than they would be without (most) cars.
If the income is tied to actual SLAs for transit, then great.

Otherwise, they can just use the toll money to divert general funds away from transit to other stuff.

Because the public by and large doesn’t enjoy public transit?
No you’re right people rave about the car centric design of Los Angeles and it’s very efficient. Phoenix is a bastion of free movement and doesn’t demand everyone own a vehicle.

The public very much enjoys the convenience and speed of well funded public transit. Even if they don’t always enjoy the actual process if it isn’t well kept and clean.

Most New Yorkers commute via public transit.
Not because they like it.
It’s literally the only way to move that many people. What’s your point?
It's far faster to travel on subway than by car. Why wouldn't they like it?