Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dottedmag 915 days ago
Open source is a technical detail. One can see a less drastical change that will have the same effect.

1. Update the laws so that the shenanigans of the companies are finally named as they are:

- Retroactively removing a feature is stealing from the owner.

- Deleting bought digital content is also stealing from the owner.

- Spying on a user is an unlawful search.

2. Make these transgressions be investigated by the prosecutor's office, so that a citizen only needs to report it to them and not figure out how to get a class lawsuit going. This will allow security researchers to do their job.

3. Classify devices with unpatched and unpatcheable security bugs as "unfit for use" and eligible for a full unconditional refund, and extend warranties on them to, say, 15 years.

4. Obviously, make any kind of security research legal and protected from intimidation by the companies.

2 comments

> bought digital content

The fundamental problem lies here: you haven't actually bought anything useful. You didn't buy content, you bought a license, and that license is merely "you might be able to view content in a very specific way for an unspecified amount of time that is completely at our discretion".

You still have what you bought when they revoke the license, it's just in a different and less useful state.

That whole system needs to be crushed into dust to make a real difference. Make it so that buying a license to content isn't a thing - that you are now actually buying content - and all of the things that come with ownership will follow.

But I don't see any viable path to that happening. A sightly more possible outcome would be to have a minimum standards/requirements for digital content purposes - a set of required rights/restrictions/components for any digital purchase the all licenses must incorporate or cannot compromise on.

Exactly: this "license" thing has to be changed to buying digital content.
I branch off company close branch down because it was unprofitable - I don’t have to support device.

Other approach, only huge companies start making devices because medium size companies cannot take the risk of the refunds.

Users are worse off, companies are worse off everything with the outlined rules is worse. Making law is hard.

Agreed. Still, reverse engineering unsupported software or hardware should be made legal.
Why can't it enter the public domain by default? Like how copyright used to work for media.
Make managers personally responsible.