[naet]

There's a massive jump in that logic, which is basically equating a large neural net to being exactly the same as a singular human being. If you ask me that is clearly not the case. They operate in entirely different ways and have very different properties.

[prvc]

>There's a massive jump in that logic, which is basically equating a large neural net to being exactly the same as a singular human being.

It does not assume that.

[CamperBob2]

Are you willing to give up this point of view the first time you fail a Turing test? It seems only fair.