|
|
|
|
|
|
by cycomanic
922 days ago
|
|
|
I think I've seen arguments from the same person before. The key assumption here is a 2% annual increase in world energy demand. No shit sherlock, after 1000 years numbers are huge. Funny thing is he only criticises renewables this way, but if we make the same calculation for any any energy source we pretty much come to the same conclusion. Maybe the person has an agenda? |
|
|