|
|
|
|
|
by CogitoCogito
928 days ago
|
|
Presumably /u/orand is taking issue with the title calling the phenomenon impossible while aware it isn't impossible and then leaving the explanation for why it's possible to later in the article. Personally I don't find it an overly harsh take. The title is straight up lying. |
|
it's not it says 'impossible' in quotes which tells you it's not really impossible