[jimmyechan]

I think I understand the irk, but I feel that your presumption of our intention in posting a GitHub URL is unfair. In fact, I'm not sure how else we'd share the news that you can self-host this without posting a Github link. We've made it very clear throughout the comments that we are not an open source project and nowhere in our website or GitHub do we try to mislead people to think so.

[oefrha]

I fail to see why the Show HN link shouldn’t be https://www.dropbase.io, which is in the very first sentence.

But maybe I’m the dinosaur. I still associate GitHub with open source, but closed source developer tool startups seem to increasingly use it as a ProductHunt.

[jimmyechan]

Some context here is that our launch is mainly to developers. Other users can't even sign up from the website or use the product without self-hosting. In any case, we'd still need to post a link to Github, somewhere.

If you're saying it's ok to post a Github link to a non-open source project, but just not as the main URL, I'd understand, but I still feel that in our specific case, the Github link is the least friction path to set up for self-hosting. I think a developer who goes to a marketing site and doesn't easily find way to setup/self-host would be more frustrated.

[oefrha]

> I think a developer who goes to a marketing site and doesn't easily find way to setup/self-host would be more frustrated.

In that case the marketing site should probably be fixed.

"If it can be self-hosted, it has to be on GitHub" is a really weird claim, considering that tons of "self-hosted" open source projects aren't on GitHub. debian.org, for instance.

Also, I personally wouldn't call something that requires an external backend API (if I'm understanding this correctly?) "self-hosted". Partially self-hosted? Not sure. It's not exactly on prem either.